Skip to content
NIYAM for pmcs & consultants

Keep the evidence, observation and response together.

Give consultant reviewers a controlled project record for inspection follow-up while professional judgement and certification stay with authorised people.

A project like yours

Cedar School consultant review

Hyderabad · Institutional construction
Demonstration project · Work in progress

Explore Cedar School consultant review in five scenes
01 / 05

Start with assigned access and the review milestone.

The consultant sees the Cedar School site context, inspection stage and responsible project team without inheriting unrelated project access.

Current focus: services inspection and finishes

Explore this workflow
Actual NIYAM consultant view for the fictional Cedar School project, showing assigned milestones, lead and open response.
Actual NIYAM screen · Fictional demo data Open full screenshot (new tab)
02 / 05

Keep the observation beside the submitted proof.

The corridor clearance record and fire-door evidence show what the consultant reviewed and which contractor response remains open.

One inspection response remains assigned

Explore this workflow
Desktop view: Actual NIYAM inspection evidence for the fictional Cedar School review, with named uploader and human verification. Phone view: Actual NIYAM mobile inspection evidence for the fictional Cedar School consultant review.
Actual NIYAM screen · Fictional demo data Open full screenshot (new tab) Open full screenshot (new tab)
03 / 05

Check material evidence without claiming acceptance.

Fire-door receipts and recorded installation usage provide context for the inspection review.

12 sets received − 8 used = 4 recorded on site

Explore this workflow
Actual NIYAM fire-door material ledger for the fictional Cedar School review, showing evidence-backed receipt, use and balance.
Actual NIYAM screen · Fictional demo data Open full screenshot (new tab)
04 / 05

Review cost context only where access allows it.

Internal bills stay in the authorised team view; the client receives only selected reviewed information.

₹31,000 installer balance · internal ledger remains private

Explore this workflow
Actual NIYAM cost records available to the fictional Cedar consultant role, with approved costs and clear balances.
Actual NIYAM screen · Fictional demo data Open full screenshot (new tab)
05 / 05

Make the open action visible in the reviewed report.

The report brings the observation, evidence and contractor response together while leaving certification to the consultant.

Reviewed evidence with one open response

Explore this workflow
Actual NIYAM approved consultant DPR for the fictional Cedar School, with evidence, review history and open follow-up.
Actual NIYAM screen · Fictional demo data Open full screenshot (new tab)

Prompt ideas require a connected assistant and permitted access. Review proposed changes before saving.

Screens captured from NIYAM on 9 September 2026. Names, amounts and projects are fictional. Site photos inside the demo are AI illustrations.

From site to client

Give each person the right view.

For PMCs, inspection consultants and client representatives reviewing selected contractor progress and follow-up.

The contractor engineer

Submits the work update, inspection evidence and response in the correct project context.

Explore this role

The consultant reviewer

Checks selected evidence, records the observation and assigns the required follow-up.

Explore this role

The client representative

Receives the reviewed report and sees which actions remain open.

Explore this role
The client’s side

A clear view of the work you share.

Selected progress and reports keep your client informed. Supplier bills and internal expenses stay with your team.

How sharing works
Actual NIYAM client portal for the fictional Cedar School, showing only approved project progress and shared evidence.
Actual NIYAM screen · Fictional demo data Open full screenshot (new tab)
The Agentic Stack

Ask for help.
Keep the decision.

Connect assistance to your site context. Check the records, review the proposal and confirm the work you want saved.

ChatGPT · Assisted setup

Start with a question.

Explore connecting ChatGPT to permitted NIYAM workflows through MCP.

ChatGPT connection guide
Codex · Assisted setup

Plan the team’s workflow.

Connect supported NIYAM tools for scoped work. Check the source, review the action and verify its result.

Codex connection guide
NIYAM · Review before saving

Prepare the routine parts.

Configured bill extraction and report drafts support review. General internal-agent actions are not yet qualified.

See bill review

Core site work has a complete manual path. New integrations are agreed by scope.

How MCP connects the tools
Before you start

A clear fit for your team.

NIYAM organises submitted records and review context. It does not perform an independent inspection, certify quantities or quality, or automatically approve contractor work.

Review access and controls
Can a consultant review contractor evidence without full workspace access?

Use assigned site access, supported role permissions and selected client views. The workspace owner remains responsible for the scope and records granted to each person.

How does an inspection observation stay accountable?

Keep the observation with its site, date, supporting evidence, responsible owner and next action. The reviewer then checks the response before changing its status.

Does NIYAM approve construction quality?

No. It records evidence and review decisions. Inspection judgement, certification, measurements and client acceptance remain with the authorised professionals.

Can cost records be restricted?

Yes. Role and site access determine supported internal views, while client reports expose only the information deliberately selected for sharing.

Can the client see open issues in a report?

Yes, when the team includes the reviewed issue and next action in the selected report. Hidden photos and internal costs remain outside the client view.

Can an assistant summarise missing evidence?

A connected assistant can prepare source-linked findings where supported. A reviewer checks access, omissions and wording before a proposed action is saved or shared.

Start where you are

One site is a good beginning.

Add the current plan, bring in your team and record the next day’s work. For an existing project, agree opening stock and balances before you carry them forward.

Plan your first site
Start free trialReview plans and limits firstChoose your plan before the trial begins.